Is your AI use case high-risk under Annex III

Methodology: map · optional AI · human review

AnnexPath maps a described AI use case to the Annex III high-risk categories under Article 6, states which ones are triggered and why, and lists what that classification changes. Decision-support only — not legal advice and not a conformity certificate.

1. What the engine owns

Deterministic lines with cited articles, conditional triggers, and a provider demand checklist. Demo is labelled Rule-based — never silent mock.

2. What optional AI may do

Polish wording when a key is configured. Upstream failure returns 502. No invented legal conclusions or conformity claims.

3. What you must do

Verify against Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 primary text.
Keep humans accountable for oversight assignments and notices.
Track the Annex III timeline against the consolidated text before you rely on a date.

4. What we deliberately do not do

Broad TPRM / CVE monitoring (that dilutes the Act-focused moat).
Replace VendorVet vendor screening — use VendorVet before you buy.
Legal advice, CE marking, or the official EU Compliance Checker.